It can scan up to dpi resolution in approximately seconds. Though OpticFilm i SE is not a stand-alone scanner, it provides great option to scan film and slide and produce great result with its advanced technology. The resolution can go up to dpi and the output format is JPEG. The scanning speed is absolutely fast which takes up to 2 seconds while the preview speed can take only up to 0.
Though it is not recommended for big project scanning, the features this scanner have is a great value for money. If you have a large number of 35mm slides and 35mm film negatives that you want to turn into digital photos, these are all great options that will provide what you need. These slide and film scanner reviews should be a great way for you to determine the kind of machine that you want and that you are able to afford.
Now you will be able to take all of those memoirs that you had stored in boxes and upload them to your computer, website or social media pages. We recommend that you invest on the best quality you can find if you have a large collection of slides or films that need to be converted to a digital format. Please guide me to purchase a film scanner which can be used professionally without hampering the quality of the scanned output to even the slightest. It should automatically remove the dust and scratches of the original and give a sharp and vivid output to the fullest satisfaction of the customer.
I would like to use it for business purpose. Kindly also let me know the price of the same. The Epson have Digital Ice which is created to remove dust and scratches. Use a drum scanner. Find a big room to put it in, and spend a lot of time learning how to use it. Used, expect to pay several thousand and make sure it works before purchase.
Imacon are marketed as drum scanners. They are not. Epson V whatever, Nikon coolscan, Plustek are not professional devices. They barely get above optical dpi and 3. Fine for home use, not for professional results. Gosh Joe, we have All done with Nikon Coolscans. Would your suggestions of the Epson v or Epson v be the same for scanning old slides and negatives in museum collections?
We have a large number of slides and negatives we need to scan to digital that are in our collections, several from long term archaeological projects done in the s to s. Most of slide film used was Kodachrome. We will be scanning to a new iMac.
Best 35mm Film and Slide Scanner Reviews
The Epson v, V or V are great for scanning tons of old slides and film negatives. What I like about the Epson is its Digital Ice technology which automatically removes dust, hair, scratches or other obstructions. The PowerSlide is also good option only for 35mm slide scanning. It can scan slide by batch up to 50 slides nonstop at a time.
It depends on what you mean by large number. You will not get dust removal so you will need to unmount the slides and clean them. It might take a week to unmount and clean slides. Only silverfast studio AI has dust and scratch removal for kodachrome. Also Kodachrome images will come out blueish unless you use an IT8 target for color. I would spend a week unmounting the slides and cleaning them and then use the dust and scratch removal in photoshop to fix the rest. Hi, I have the Epson v to scan my 35 mm negatives.
Is there a device that does such a thing? Do you mean previewing the negatives? Try the Loupe Magnifiers. My job: Is there a scanner or process that would make this easier? Any thoughts on which scanner or software that would help me save our family history as Dad intended?
Thank you so much. It is actually the software that can append those captions. You can do the caption through Photoshop. I have a chance to pick up the Nikon at a fair price. Thank you. The Epson V is rather advanced than the Nikon Coolscan. The Epson V is not just a film and slide scanner but also a photo and document scanner. Though both use Digital Ice which is a great feature for fixing those scratches on images. Is there a special insert for metal slide jackets that I can order or do I have to remove each slide from the metal jacket?
Whats the real difference in the V and the F? I mean money is not the issue however the resolutions seem about the same. I am going to do a family project of 1, of photos and want the best quality. I was thinking of the FF but that idea is blown out of the water because most photos are in a folder. The Epson v and v have superb image quality output. What I like about these scanners is its digital ice features which detects and corrects scratches and removes dust on photos.
However using the digital ice makes the scanning slow. On the other hand, the F Mark II is also great scanner.
Apple World Today Rating (out of 5 stars): ★★★★★
It is simple and easy to use. However the scans are not that excellent but not bad either. In terms of energy efficiency, there is an Epson v which is Energy Star Certified. I have Windows 10 on my laptop. Any advice would be appreciated. What I would recommend is to debug. Uninstall the drivers and try to install it one by one.
I have no conflicts between two drivers installed on the same OS. Thanks for that.
The Best Photo Scanners for 12222
Maybe it was just a HP thing. I just tried and returned the Jumbl 22MP.
- What is the best film/slide scanner for i… - Apple Community.
- srt to sub idx mac;
- Apple Footer.
- league of legends mac version 10.5.8.
- windows op de mac installeren;
- All replies;
- Digitize Your Precious Photos?
I got it to replace an older Jumbl 5 MP, hoping for better resolution. The new Jumbl often got colors badly wrong — yellow or green in excess. The older Jumbl scanned the same negatives without problems. The 5MP Jumbl is fast and easy. The Jumble 22MP was a disappointment — perhaps I just got a bad unit. I have an old Konica-Minolta Dimage scanner, however that software is no longer supported and does not work in Windows.
It is also a very slow slide scanner. Have you tried to clean the lens of Jumbl 22MP or the films you want to scan? You can preview the image first and adjust the color and exposure. Regarding with batch slide scanning, the PowerSlide is a good option while Wolverine F2D Mighty 20MP 7-in-1 or is a good for fast 35mm film scanning. I usually choose the autofeed scanners rather than flatbed when scanning hundreds of films.
Is there another scanner that will do batch? You will be amazed by its scanning speed but the output is not good. I use the autofeed scanners when scanning multiple films and slides. The PowerSlide is by far the best option for batch scanning. Can you recommend a stand alone scanner for photos? I am trying to digitize a photo collection for my hometown Historical Society and would like higher res stand alone photo scanning on site that I can clean up later on my computer.
These are good stand alone scanners: Pandigital Personal Photo Scanner: Resolution of dpi Doxie Go Plus: Resolution of dpi. Hi, I will be starting a project of scanning thousands of family 35mm negatives and slides. I am in the market for a high end scanner that has an output that allows for image manipulation in Adobe CC. Should I be looking for a scanner that produces RAW files? What would you suggest? Do you need fast scanning method or just the typical flatbed or auto fed scanners? Notably, the X5 allows you to scan reflective media prints in addition to transparencies and negatives, and also supports additional batch processing and slide feeder components for scanning multiple originals in one go.
The X5 also has active cooling, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio for cleaner shadows, and a light condenser for hardware-based dust removal, as opposed to just the software-based dust removal of the X1. Lastly, the X5 is simply a faster machine, which can output scans at up to MB per minute versus the 60MB per minute of the X1. Is there an entery level to mid-range scanner that can handle that size slide. Most are in surprisingly good condition. Their size is 3. I'm trying to find a film scanner that can handle negatives this size, but the largest I have found can only scan up to 3 x 5 inch negatives.
Does anyone know of a scanner that can handle the size negative that I have? Unfortunately, I was not able to find a film format that was 3" x 6" in size. In any case, all of these options have been discontinued for multiple decades and are no longer considered standard film formats, so they do not have designated negative holders for use with these negative sizes. Any recommendations for a self-service slide scanner?
Looking for something that customers can use without a lot of handholding. I've been bitten by the Minox bug, so to speak, and an amazed at the detail I can get from these with high resolution film and especially wet enlargements. What scanner do you recommend to get the most out of subminiature format films? I have a large number of very old black and white negatives, from when my grandparents took photos with the little black box of cameras.
I also have alot of and some 35mm. Possible there is one scanner that could convert them all to digital format? I know they are going to need cleaning up once digitized. Thank you!! The V has dpi, 3. It comes with film holders for 35mm and film and you can use this adapter for film:.
Hello and thanks for a great article! I'd like to enlarge my polaroids and polaroid transfers on watercolor paper to large, wall-size fine art prints for gallery submission. I also would like to convert digital files to slides and create large prints from my slides, so wondering the best path would be. Could you make some recommendations about what I could use at home without having to take out a loan? Thanks in advance!
Best 35mm Film and Slide Scanner Reviews in
I would recommend a good flatbed scanner for scanning the Polaroid transfers such as the Epson V You can turn the dust software off if you feel it is trying to fix the defects that sometimes occur in Polaroid transfers. As far as creating slides from a digital file, I don't think that is possible anymore. We used to sell items like the Mirus film recorder or Polaroid Pro Pallette film recorder.
Those devices produced a slide or negative depending on the type of film you used in them. Those types of film recorders have not been made, or supported in several years. I have looked them up on Ebay in the past and saw some labs selling them with Windows 98 or NT computers specifically to run them as they did not work with newer operating systems. For large print output I recommend outsourcing it to a lab. There are many online labs that allow you to upload the file and choose a large print size.
You could also consider a large format inkjet printer for yourself but I would not recommend them unless you find you are spending too much with the lab. Unfortunately your options are fairly limited for at-home movie film scanning. To handle your 35mm and 16mm films, there is the Blackmagic Cintel https: Glass plate negatives are very delicate, and even if they appear to be in good condition, they can be damaged easily. Another potential issue is Newton's rings.
This can happen when placing negs on a flatbed scanner. I don't know whether a glass negative will suffer from Newton's rings. It's possible that it won't, but you should still be aware of it. If you're really concerned about damaging the negs, you might consider laying down a piece of transparent acetate or something similar on the scanner. This will really help protect the negs, and help you lift them back up. But it increases the odds of Newton's rings. Another option would be to create spacers or a frame made out of matte board on which to place the glass negatives, thus raising it above the glass.
The thinner the better. The reason most flatbed scanners have a very limited or very shallow depth of field is because their focusing are mostly automatic and do not have a manual feature. This means you cannot adjust the focusing point and the glass your negative is thicker than modern negatives or slides. And since you will be essentially scanning through glass on to a glass negative, you raise the chance of having refraction of light issues since you are adding a third glass surface and thickness to the equation.
This might lead to undesired effects, every time the light of the scanner goes through a glass surface it will undergo some kind of refraction which can produce many different kinds of optical effects, aberrations, etc. The best scanner that addresses these problems is the Perfection V by Epson. Abnormal Ghost images are reduced. They also have the greatest depth of field than any flatbeds in this size the Epson Expression XL is considered to have the greatest DoF of any flatbed scanner in the prosumer market. Other recommendations for best results are to scan in bit color mode, and as a TIFF file, even with black and white negatives.
In this way you will have an unmodified negative. Also, negatives hold a ton of information, and a mere grayscale levels won't be enough to play with. And post production enhancements will be limited with less potentially optimum ability for enhancement or improvement. Also you ,ay want to experiment by making two different scans one for each side of the glass and see which one results in a better scan. Our historical society has a collection of 4" X 5" glass emulsion negatives and slides that we need to scan.
Any suggestions? I have a View Master stereo camera that I purchased in the mids. I have many 3D reels of photos that I shot from about to I would like to digitize these photos somehow. I used 35mm slide film, but the images are in approximately 8mm size. For example, a 36 exposure roll of film results in approximately 70 stereo pairs.
I have a cutter for this film and blank stereo reels that I inserted these frames into. I will likely need multiple scanners for photos, negatives, slides, and 8mm film. Some people will want only digital images while others will often want hi-res files they can have made into large prints. What are some good models to start with? It can do this quickly with an automatic batch scanning feature and uses a high resolution dpi sensor with bit color depth to capture all the detail from your originals.
The newly redesigned film holders ensure proper positioning during scanning and ensure the images won't be skewed or misaligned. The scanner's built-in infrared channel provides dust and scratch removal without cumbersome post processing. Additionally, the included IT 8 calibration slide ensures accurate color results the first time, reducing the need for repeated scans or extensive post processing color correction.
The included SilverFast Ai Studio 8 works together with the scanner to improve your workflow and ensure proper results the first time. This updated version features an improved user interface and provides an advanced preview option that lets you see the results of adjustments beforehand. I have several thousand slides from professional sports I shot in the 's. I'd like to digitize them at the best quality possible for professional use, both for printing and publication. What would you recommend for a scanner and software? I have a large number of half-frame 35mm slides.
Will any of the scanners you profile handle converting these slides? The slide mount should be the same as for 35mm. Do you think Epson is worth the difference? Hi there, I have a Lomography Horizon that takes panoramic photos but it costs a fortune to get each roll developed and printed. Which scanner would you reccomend for digitizing to a good enough quality to print from?
Unlike other scanning masks, the DigitaLIZA accommodates the digitization of experimental analog photographs by scanning the whole negative strip, including the sprockets, without defining the frames individually. This lets you scan overlapping exposures, doubles, triples, and panoramas. In the long run, owning a scanner will be far more effective than sending out the negatives to be printed. The high dpi optical resolution and x dpi scan resolution along with a bit color depth ensure fine detail will be captured and colors will be accurately reproduced.
Also, a rating of 4. Great article. I'm an avid film shooter, mostly 35mm but occasionally In the past I've tried the wolverine scanners and wasn't very happy with how they tried auto correcting the exposure of my image. Currently I am using an Epson flatbed v, I do like it, but the scanning process takes forever.
It seems to be the best scanner for my needs. Hello, can you please advise me as to the best scanner for archiving family photos and slides. Large volume of slides from the last 5 decades, some of which are needed for historical archiving of service in Vietnam. Also a large number of photos, most 3x5 to 8x Which scanners are best for all this and documents as well? I am an apple user, and not a professional photographer.
Thank you. There are 2 scanners that I recommend which will cover your needs. They are the V and the V by Epson. They both are flatbed scanners, both have a transparency media adapter built into the lids which allow for the scanning of film. Both have features for scanning documents, converting them to editable text, PDFs and automatic Scan to Email.
The Epson Easy Photo Fix app restores faded color photos with one touch.
- captura de pantalla con mac air.
- best firewire 800 audio interface mac!
- apple power mac g4 upgrades.
Both can boast having an optical resolution of up to So that means the scan quality must also be the same, right? Oh yeah, and resolution plays a role in quality scanning, too. The dynamic range of the V is 4. The V is a scanner specially for photo and film print reproduction and restoration. It has upgraded photo and film scanning and restoration features, ability to scan all sizes of film, up to 8x The V is the affordable of the two. And it is our number 1 selling photo scanner for home use.
Itgis a good quality scanner and gets the job done. However, the V is superior in what it does, and that is photo and film restoration and print reproduction. I am looking for an affordable scanner that can handle film in a 6 by 7 cm format. I would like a relitively high resolution so that the images can be used to produce large prints without too much image degridation.
What would you suggest? It is designed for advanced amateurs or professionals that require the image quality and an ICC profiled scanning system. Dynamic Range of 4. Included are a holder for 6x4. The 6x7 holder is designed so you don't have to cut 3-frame 6x7 film strips. Plustek does retail extra film holders which we should be carrying soon. Extremely limited software with no photo editor. Quickly scans stacks of photo prints. Decent as a document scanner. Scans to searchable PDF. Solid OCR performance. Somewhat pricey. Slower at photo scanning than its predecessor. Fully automatic mode for easy scanning.
Scans to editable text and searchable PDF formats. No film-scan capability. Lacks bundled applications. It's our top budget pick for high-quality photo scanning. High-quality scans for a flatbed scanner at its price. Can scan slides, negatives, and medium-format film as well as prints. Digital ICE hardware-based dust removal for film. Can upload scans directly to Facebook and cloud-based services. Lacks photo-editing program. Not ideal for document scanning. High-resolution, wide-format scanning.
Scans slides, negatives, and transparencies, as well as reflective photos and artwork. Highly accurate color and detail. Big and heavy. Transparency unit comes uninstalled. The Best Scanners for Macs. As Analyst for printers, scanners, and projectors, Tony Hoffman tests and reviews these products and provides news coverage for these categories.
Tony has worked at PC Magazine since , first as a Staff Editor, then as Reviews Editor, and more recently as Managing Editor for the printers, scanners, and projectors team.